I might feel slightly differently if the Ironclaw Wireless had a superior battery life to either of its wireless rivals, but its 2.4GHz endurance is miles behind the Harpoon RGB Wireless, coming in at just 16 hours with its default RGB lighting enabled and 24 hours without, while the Harpoon's respective batteries lives are rated for 30 and 45 hours. This may be less of a problem for those with larger, more flexible hands than I, but every second I use the Ironclaw RGB Wireless just makes me long for either the Harpoon RGB Wireless or regular wired Ironclaw RGB - or, indeed, my trusty Logitech. I just wish all of its many buttons were easier to press without me having to consciously think about it. Here, you get all the usual options, such as being able to assign keyboard commands, media controls, recordable macros, as well as using them to launch certain applications, and you can also assign one button to be a dedicated sniper button, which will slow the Ironclaw Wireless' DPI speed down to a crawl to help line up things like headshots when playing games online. Bizarrely, these are the DPI up and down buttons by default (not the two below the scroll wheel, which cycle through its three available profiles), but thankfully you can assign this function to whichever button you want by downloading Corsair's iCUE software. I also found it hard to press the lower of the two forefinger buttons further up the mouse. That means squashing your thumb even closer to your forefinger, and it's just not very easy or practical to do in the heat of the moment. The bottom two are easy enough to tap, but the top one definitely requires a proper press from above, rather than below or the side where your thumb might naturally sit in order to hit the other two. The move from seven to ten programmable buttons also feels mildly unnecessary, as trying to hit its knobbly Triforce of thumb buttons is almost impossible without a lot of deliberate thought and concentration. While the wired version was just about okay for my spindly fingers at 105g, the wireless model comes in a whopping 130g, which, after the 80g delights of my day-to-day Logitech G Pro Wireless mouse (and even the 99g Harpoon RGB Wireless) just feels like I'm shunting a very large rock around my desk (albeit a very smooth large rock) instead of a light, nimble clicking machine. The main problem I have with the Ironclaw RGB Wireless is that it's so damn heavy. It also has the same 100-18,000 DPI sensor inside it, too, and a 1.8m braided cable for when you need to charge it. Its large, palm-hogging shape and patterned, rubbery sides are just as comfy and lovely to the touch as before, and its soft, smooth finish doesn't get sullied by horrible sweat patches when you take your hand off it. Here's wot I think.įrom the outside, the £85 / $73 Ironclaw RGB Wireless feels more or less identical to its wired £45 / $58 sibling. Therefore, it surely follows that a wireless version of the Ironclaw RGB, which uses the same Corsair Slipstream technology as the Harpoon Wireless, should be another absolute shoe-in, right? Err. The Ironclaw RGB went straight into my list of the best gaming mice when I looked at it back in March, as did the Harpoon RGB Wireless when I tested it in May. We've purchased the product and are waiting for it to arrive in our lab.Corsair have produced some fantastic gaming mice this year. The product has arrived in our lab, and our testers will start evaluating it soon. For more details, you can see our full changelog here. This update revamps our Click Latency test and results in changes to test results. We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.1. We've updated the text to reflect our new results in various sections, including the Click Latency test box, Usages, Introduction, and other locations where we discuss click latency. We've updated this review to Test Bench 1.1, which revamped our click latency test methodology. For more details, you can see our complete changelog here. This update simplifies our Weight test and expands on our CPI test from Test Bench 1.1, resulting in changes to test results in both sections. We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.2. For more information, you can check out our full changelog here. This update adds a new Sensor Latency test and makes minor changes to several of our existing tests, resulting in test result changes in several sections. We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |